UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Rethinking Ostensive Communication in an Evolutionary, Comparative, and Developmental Perspective

Sperber, Dan; Wilson, Deirdre; (2025) Rethinking Ostensive Communication in an Evolutionary, Comparative, and Developmental Perspective. Psychological Review 10.1037/rev0000565. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Rethinking Ostensive Communication in an Evolutionary, Comparative and Developmental Perspective.pdf]
Preview
Text
Rethinking Ostensive Communication in an Evolutionary, Comparative and Developmental Perspective.pdf - Published Version

Download (973kB) | Preview

Abstract

Ostensive communication (Sperber & Wilson, 1986/1995) involves both an informative and a communicative intention: The communicator draws attention not only to the information she intends to convey but also to her intention to convey it. This elicits an expectation of relevance in addressees that guides them in identifying the information communicated. This notion of ostensive communication has been influential in pragmatics, developmental psychology, and comparative psychology but also raises many questions. In the light of much relevant research, elaboration, and criticism over the years, we put forward a revised, broadened, more explicit, and more explanatory account of ostensive communication and of the role played in it by cognitive expectations of relevance and social expectations of cooperativeness. We distinguish two forms of ostension: In basic ostension, communicators give evidence of the information they intend to communicate, and in mentalistic communication, they give evidence of their intention to communicate that information. We interpret relevant comparative psychology findings (such as Go´mez, 1996) as suggesting that a basic, nonmentalistic form of ostension may have evolved in great apes as a solution to the problems and opportunities presented by intentional communication. We discuss Csibra and Gergely’s (2009) “natural pedagogy theory” claim that ostension is specifically adapted for the transmission of general knowledge to children. Correcting earlier pragmatic theories inspired by Grice (1989) including our own, we argue that typical verbal communication makes use of both basic and mentalistic ostension.

Type: Article
Title: Rethinking Ostensive Communication in an Evolutionary, Comparative, and Developmental Perspective
Location: United States
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000565
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000565
Language: English
Additional information: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0). This license permits copying and redistributing the work in any medium or format for noncommercial use provided the original authors and source are credited and a link to the license is included in attribution. No derivative works are permitted under this license.
Keywords: Social Sciences, Psychology, Psychology, Multidisciplinary, communication, comparative and developmental psychology, evolution, mentalizing, relevance theory, RATIONAL IMITATION, PAN-PANISCUS, GREAT APES, TOP-DOWN, RELEVANCE, INFANTS, REPRESENTATION, COOPERATION, MECHANISMS, CHIMPANZEE
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Linguistics
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10211547
Downloads since deposit
12Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item