UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Outcomes of Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies

Ślusarczyk, Aleksander; Gurwin, Adam; Barnaś, Anna; Ismail, Hamza; Miszczyk, Marcin; Zapała, Piotr; Przydacz, Mikołaj; ... Section of Urologic Oncology of Polish Urological Association; + view all (2025) Outcomes of Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. European Urology Oncology 10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.003. (In press).

[thumbnail of Kasivisvanathan_PCa focal therapy manuscript_revised_R2.pdf] Text
Kasivisvanathan_PCa focal therapy manuscript_revised_R2.pdf
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 3 January 2026.

Download (370kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Focal therapies (FTs) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) are recommended only within prospective registries or clinical trials. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to synthesize data from prospective trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of FTs in patients with clinically localized PCa. METHODS: Systematic searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases identified prospective studies reporting oncological outcomes of FTs in treatment-naïve, clinically localized PCa patients. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven clinically significant PCa (csPCa; International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2) recurrence-free survival (csPCa RFS). The secondary endpoints included RFS, radical/systemic treatment-free survival, and adverse event (AE) rates. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Fifty studies including 4615 patients treated with FTs were analyzed; of these 50 studies, 19 were on predominantly intermediate-risk (n = 2800), 16 on mixed low-/intermediate-risk (n = 990), and 15 on low-risk (n = 825) patients. Estimates of 12- and 24-mo csPCa RFS rates were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82-89%) and 81% (95% CI: 74-86%), respectively. In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the 12-mo csPCa RFS rate was 79% (95% CI: 74-83%). Five-year radical and systemic treatment-free survival was 82% (95% CI: 75-88%). The pooled incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was 3% (95% CI: 2-5%). Pad-requiring urinary incontinence increased by 3% (95% CI: 0-6%), with 11% of patients developing new erectile dysfunction (95% CI: 4-18%). The median follow-up of 21 mo (interquartile range 12-34) and the use of surrogate endpoints constitute the major limitations. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The primarily short-term data from prospective studies of FT in clinically localized PCa demonstrate moderate to high cancer control with a favorable safety profile.

Type: Article
Title: Outcomes of Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies
Location: Netherlands
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.003
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.003
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Ablation techniques, Focal ablation, Progression, Prostate cancer, Prostatic neoplasm, Recurrence
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Surgery and Interventional Sci
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10210638
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item