UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Do nest sites limit wild honey bee colonies? Decoding swarm waggle dances to assess nest site availability

Visick, Oliver D; Adams, Idris; Ney, Phoebe; Marzano, Francesco S; Ratnieks, Francis LW; (2024) Do nest sites limit wild honey bee colonies? Decoding swarm waggle dances to assess nest site availability. Ecological Entomology , 49 (6) pp. 869-880. 10.1111/een.13361. Green open access

[thumbnail of Ecological Entomology - 2024 - Visick - Do nest sites limit wild honey bee colonies  Decoding swarm waggle dances to assess-2.pdf]
Preview
Text
Ecological Entomology - 2024 - Visick - Do nest sites limit wild honey bee colonies Decoding swarm waggle dances to assess-2.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

1. Nest sites are often considered to limit wild honey bee, Apis mellifera, colonies in Europe where wild colony densities are low (mean 0.26/km2 ). Nest site availability can be challenging to quantify directly, especially in urban areas and farmland where colonies nest in different substrates. 2. Here we assess nest site availability indirectly across large areas (78.5 km2 ) of mixed habitat (67% farmland, 25% urban and 8% woodland) by decoding 3310 waggle dances produced by scouts on swarms. During summers of 2021 and 2022, 14 artificial swarms were set up in two study areas in East Sussex, England. 3. Swarms advertised three to nine nest locations (mean of 5.5) at distances of 0.1– 11.2 km (median 1.2 km) all within 0.4–15.2 daylight hours after dancing commenced (median 2.7). We estimated the total number of nest locations, including those not advertised, by quantifying the overlap in locations advertised by two swarms (a form of mark–recapture), which gave a mean density of approximately three nest sites per km2 . 4. The probability of swarms advertising nest sites per km2 , calculated using simulations of dance variation, was an average of 42% higher in urban areas (0.018/km2 ), 78% higher in woodland (0.023/km2 ) and 12% lower in farmland (0.011/km2 ) than random expectation. After controlling for distance, swarms were still more likely than expected to advertise nest sites in woodland but only in one study area. 5. Our results indicate that nest sites do not limit wild colonies in the study areas given that our conservative estimate of nest site density (3/km2 ) exceeds the density of wild colonies on nearby landed estates (2/km2 ) and other locations in Europe (0.26/km2 ).

Type: Article
Title: Do nest sites limit wild honey bee colonies? Decoding swarm waggle dances to assess nest site availability
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/een.13361
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13361
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Ecological Entomology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Entomological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Apis mellifera, artificial swarms, conservation, landscape ecology, nest site availability, waggle dance decoding, wild honey bees
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Life Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Life Sciences > Div of Biosciences
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10207861
Downloads since deposit
4Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item