Kneale, Dylan;
Vigurs, Carol;
Xu, Jie;
Marshall Kissoon, Katherine;
Mendizabal-Espinosa, Rosa;
Bangpan, Mukdarut;
(2024)
Innovation Districts: a rapid systematic review and synthesis of innovation district studies.
EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London: London, UK.
Preview |
Text
Innovation districts report LO-221024 (1).pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Innovation Districts are urban interventions designed to cluster key stakeholders and resources within a specific area to drive technological, creative, and scientific advancements. Although they are viewed as a tool for promoting sustainable growth and reducing spatial inequalities, empirical evidence on their real-world impact has largely not been synthesised.// Objective: This study aimed to map and synthesise empirical evidence on the economic and social impacts of Innovation Districts. Specifically, it sought to understand both short-term and long-term effects, including job creation, collaboration, and local community outcomes.// Methods: A rapid systematic review was conducted using mapping, narrative synthesis, and quantitative/qualitative approaches. Data from various geographical settings, particularly the US and Australia, were synthesized to evaluate Innovation Districts' impact on job creation and broader economic outcomes.// Components: The study reviewed 66 empirical studies and synthesised 55 of them. It focused on both short-term and long-term economic impacts, education initiatives, community engagement, and housing affordability within Innovation Districts. No UK studies on Innovation Districts were included.// Results: Innovation Districts have been effective in creating highly skilled jobs, particularly in research and development. However, they face challenges in fostering collaboration and integrating local communities. Long-term effects on job creation and housing pressures are less clear, although with some evidence indicating that Innovation Districts may exacerbate local inequalities.// Implications: While Innovation Districts show promise in economic terms, their social impacts are less understood. To prevent exacerbating inequalities, future Innovation Districts should have a greater emphasis on inclusive community engagement, equitable housing policies, and ensure that local residents benefit from the economic gains generated.
Type: | Report |
---|---|
Title: | Innovation Districts: a rapid systematic review and synthesis of innovation district studies |
ISBN-13: | 978-1-911605-65-2 |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Publisher version: | https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3941 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Innovation Districts, Economic Development |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10199000 |
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |