King, Thomas; Shafran, Roz; Hargreaves, Dougal S; Muschialli, Luke; Linton, Daniela; Bennett, Sophie; (2024) Mental health clinical pathways for children and young people with long-term health conditions: A systematic review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice , 30 (6) pp. 894-908. 10.1111/jep.14018.

Preview

Text King_Evaluation Clinical Practice - 2024 - King - Mental health clinical pathways for children and young people with long‐term.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Rationale: Clinical pathways (CPWs) are structured care plans that set out essential steps in the care of patients with a specific clinical problem. Amidst calls for the prioritisation of integrated mental and physical health care for young people, multidisciplinary CPWs have been proposed as a step towards closer integration. There is very limited evidence around CPWs for young people with mental and physical health needs, necessitating a review of the literature. // Aims and Objectives: The aim of this review is to understand how clinical pathways have been used to deliver mental health support to children and young people with long-term physical health conditions and their effectiveness across a range of outcomes. // Methods: The databases MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched from inception to 6 September 2023. Keywords linked to children and young people, mental health, long-term physical health conditions and CPWs were used. Studies using either quantitative or qualitative research designs were included. All studies must have evaluated a CPW to provide mental health support to children and young people (up to 25 years old) with long-term health physical conditions. Both mental and physical health outcomes were considered. Pathways were grouped by integration ‘model’ as described in the wider literature. // Results: The initial search returned 4082 studies after deduplication. A total of eight studies detailing six distinct care pathways (232 participants [170 children and young people; 50 caregivers; 12 healthcare professionals]) met eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Four pathways were conducted within an ‘integrated model’; two were a combination of ‘integrated’ and ‘colocated’; and none within a ‘co-ordinated model’. Only pathways within an integrated model reported quantitative health outcomes, with improvements across a range of mental health measures. One negative physical health outcome was reported from an integrated diabetes pathway, but this should be interpreted with caution. // Conclusion: This review identified a range of CPW designs but most fell under an integrated model. The results suggest that calls for integrated mental health pathways in this population may be appropriate; however, conclusions are limited by a paucity of evidence.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVJSONXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as CSVJSONXML

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as XMLJSONCSV

Archive Staff Only

View Item