Alami Fariman, Mahsa;
(2023)
Closedness and openness in Tehran; a feminist critique of Sennett.
Gender, Place & Culture
, 30
(12)
pp. 1690-1711.
10.1080/0966369x.2022.2092074.
Preview |
Text
Closedness and openness in Tehran a feminist critique of Sennett.pdf - Published Version Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper uses a feminist approach to geography to critique the theory of ‘open city’ proposed by Richard Sennett in his 2018 book, Building and Dwelling, which suggests a series of design interventions that when applied to cities can lead to an increase in sociability, complexity and tolerance of difference. Tehran is employed as a case study to examine whether open city theory is yet another Western formulation that is only applicable in democratic contexts. Considering Tehran’s top-down, oppressive, and authoritarian setting, it is seen here as a context in which the closedness and lack of active urban life in its streets and other public places are not only the result of architectural and planning schemes inherited from the ‘functional city’, as open city theory suggests, but instead are the result of rigid, top-down control mechanisms applied by the authorities. Therefore, based on feminist critical approaches such as meaning-in-context, and considering the discriminatory politics faced by women in their use of and access to public spaces in Iran, I challenge open city theory by suggesting that closedness, and its opposite, openness, are terms too charged with a Western sense of urbanisation. Instead, by examining the meaning, practicality and temporality of some of Sennett’s design interventions in Tehran, I suggest other potential ways that openness might occur; not through design, however, but among people and the solutions they find to overcome closedness in this city.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Closedness and openness in Tehran; a feminist critique of Sennett |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1080/0966369x.2022.2092074 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2022.2092074 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Keywords: | Closedness; critical feminism; gender-segregated space; open city; openness |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > Development Planning Unit |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10197371 |
Archive Staff Only
![]() |
View Item |