Fhima, Ilanah;
(2024)
Rethinking Distinctiveness of Shape Marks.
Intellectual Property Quarterly
, 2024
(3)
pp. 179-205.
Text
Fhima - Shape Marks_.pdf Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 3 September 2025. Download (632kB) |
Abstract
Consumers recognise goods by their shape as well as by how they are labelled. However, shape marks potentially grant monopoly rights in the shape of goods, which can result in functional characteristics falling into the hands of a single undertaking. The Court of Justice of the European Union adopts a cautious approach to registering shape marks. Despite the competitive risk such marks pose, the Court's reasoning has always been based on arguments that consumers will not generally view shapes of goods as indicative of origin, and not on the need to keep shape marks free for others to use. This article draws on psycholinguistics to argue that the CJEU’s approach to consumer perception is justified. However, it draws on object recognition theory which posits that there is a finite number of basic components from which shapes can be composed, suggesting that there is a competitive risk to registering shape marks which should be recognised in how the grounds for the refusal of registration are applied to shape marks.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Rethinking Distinctiveness of Shape Marks |
Publisher version: | https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Product/Intellec... |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author-accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10195087 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |