UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Agile scores in MASLD and ALD: External validation and their utility in clinical algorithms

Papatheodoridi, Margarita; De Ledinghen, Victor; Lupsor-Platon, Monica; Bronte, Fabrizio; Boursier, Jerome; Elshaarawy, Omar; Marra, Fabio; ... Tsochatzis, Emmanuel A; + view all (2024) Agile scores in MASLD and ALD: External validation and their utility in clinical algorithms. Journal of Hepatology , 81 (4) pp. 590-599. 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.05.021.

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S0168827824003568-main.pdf] Text
1-s2.0-S0168827824003568-main.pdf - Accepted Version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 17 September 2025.

Download (10MB)

Abstract

Background & Aims: Agile scores, including liver stiffness measurements (LSM) and routine clinical/laboratory biomarkers, have been developed for advanced fibrosis (F≥3) and cirrhosis (F4), respectively, in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We independently validated the diagnostic accuracy of these scores in MASLD, alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) and chronic hepatitis B or C (CHB/C) and assessed them in clinical algorithms with FIB-4 and LSM. // Methods: We included 4,243 patients (MASLD: 912, ALD: 386, CHB: 597, CHC: 2,348) with LSM, liver biopsy and laboratory tests within 6 months. FIB-4, Agile 3+ and Agile 4 scores were calculated. // Results: For F≥3, the diagnostic accuracy of Agile 3+ and LSM were similar in MASLD (AUC: 0.86 vs. 0.86, p = 0.831) and ALD (0.92 vs. 0.94, p = 0.123). For cirrhosis, Agile 4 was similar to LSM in MASLD (0.89 vs. 0.90, p = 0.412) and ALD (0.94 vs. 0.95, p = 0.513). Agile 3+/4 performed worse than LSM in CHB/C. Using predefined dual thresholds of 90% sensitivity/specificity, correct classification rates in MASLD were 66% vs. 61% using Agile 3+ vs. LS dual cut-offs and 71% vs. 67% in ALD, respectively. When using Agile 3+ or LSM as a second step after FIB-4 >1.3, correct classification rates were higher with Agile 3+ than LSM, both for MASLD (75% vs. 71%) and ALD (76% vs. 72%), with fewer indeterminate results. Positive agreement of LSM and Agile 3+/4 significantly increased the specificity of a diagnosis of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. // Conclusion: Agile 3+ and Agile 4 have equal diagnostic accuracy with LSM in both MASLD and ALD but result in fewer indeterminate results. Sequential use of FIB-4 and Agile 3+/4 or concurrent Agile 3+/4 and LSM can be used to further optimize F≥3 diagnosis.

Type: Article
Title: Agile scores in MASLD and ALD: External validation and their utility in clinical algorithms
Location: Netherlands
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.05.021
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.05.021
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Keywords: Non-invasive test, fibroscan, elastography, compensated advanced chronic liver disease, diagnostic accuracy
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Medicine
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Medicine > Inst for Liver and Digestive Hlth
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10192883
Downloads since deposit
2Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item