UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Evaluating the Acceptability of the Drink Less App and the National Health Service Alcohol Advice Web Page: Qualitative Interview Process Evaluation

Oldham, Melissa; Dinu, Larisa; Loebenberg, Gemma; Perski, Olga; Brown, Jamie; Angus, Colin; Beard, Emma; ... Garnett, Claire; + view all (2024) Evaluating the Acceptability of the Drink Less App and the National Health Service Alcohol Advice Web Page: Qualitative Interview Process Evaluation. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 26 , Article e42319. 10.2196/42319. Green open access

[thumbnail of Brown_Evaluating the acceptability of the Drink Less app and the NHS alcohol advice webpage_VoR.pdf]
Preview
Text
Brown_Evaluating the acceptability of the Drink Less app and the NHS alcohol advice webpage_VoR.pdf

Download (170kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: The extent to which interventions are perceived as acceptable to users impacts engagement and efficacy. / Objective: Here, we evaluate the acceptability of i) the smartphone app, Drink Less (intervention), and ii) the NHS alcohol advice webpage (usual digital care and comparator), among adult drinkers in the UK participating in a randomised control trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Drink Less app. / Methods: A sub-sample of 26 increasing-and-higher-risk drinkers (AUDIT≥ 8), assigned to the intervention group (Drink Less, n=14) or usual digital care (NHS alcohol advice webpage, n=12) group took part in semi-structured interviews. The interview questions were mapped on to the seven facets of acceptability according to the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA); affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy. Alongside these constructs we also included a question on perceived personal relevance, which previous research has linked to acceptability and engagement. Framework and thematic analysis of data was undertaken. / Results: The Drink Less app was perceived as being ethical, easy, user-friendly and effective for the period the app was used. Participants reported particularly liking the tracking and feedback sections of the app which they reported increased personal relevance and which resulted in positive affect when achieving their goals. They reported no opportunity cost. Factors such as negative affect when not meeting goals and boredom led to disengagement in the longer term for some participants. The NHS alcohol advice webpage was rated as being easy and user-friendly with no opportunity costs. However, the information presented was not perceived as bring personally relevant, or effective in changing drinking behaviour. Most reported neutral or negative affect and whilst most thought the alcohol advice webpage was accessible, some reported ethical concerns around availability of suggested resources. Some participants reported that it had acted as a starting point or a signpost to other resources. Participants in both groups discussed motivation to change and contextual factors such as COVID-19 lockdowns which influenced their perceived self-efficacy regardless of their assigned intervention. / Conclusions: Drink Less appears to be an acceptable digital intervention among the recruited sample. The NHS alcohol advice webpage was generally considered to be unacceptable as a standalone intervention amongst the recruited sample, although it may signpost and help people access other resources and interventions. Clinical Trial: ISRCTN64052601

Type: Article
Title: Evaluating the Acceptability of the Drink Less App and the National Health Service Alcohol Advice Web Page: Qualitative Interview Process Evaluation
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.2196/42319
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.2196/42319
Language: English
Additional information: © The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Applied Health Research
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Epidemiology and Public Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10192776
Downloads since deposit
6Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item