Hatswell, Anthony J;
(2023)
Incorporating Prior Beliefs Into Meta-Analyses of Health-State Utility Values Using the Bayesian Power Prior.
Value in Health
, 26
(9)
pp. 1389-1397.
10.1016/j.jval.2023.04.012.
Preview |
Text
1-s2.0-S1098301523025998-main.pdf - Published Version Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objectives: Health-state utility values (HSUVs) directly affect estimates of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years and thus the cost-utility estimates. In practice a single preferred value (SPV) is often selected for HSUVs, despite meta-analysis being an option when multiple (credible) HSUVs are available. Nevertheless, the SPV approach is often reasonable because meta-analysis implicitly considers all HSUVs as equally relevant. This article presents a method for the incorporation of weights to HSUV synthesis, allowing more relevant studies to have greater influence. Methods: Using 4 case studies in lung cancer, hemodialysis, compensated liver cirrhosis, and diabetic retinopathy blindness, a Bayesian Power Prior (BPP) approach is used to incorporate beliefs on study applicability, reflecting the authors’ perceived suitability for UK decision making. Older studies, non-UK value sets, and vignette studies are thus downweighted (but not disregarded). BPP HSUV estimates were compared with a SPV, random effects meta-analysis, and fixed effects meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted iteratively updating the case studies, using alternative weighting methods, and simulated data. Results: Across all case studies, SPVs did not accord with meta-analyzed values, and fixed effects meta-analysis produced unrealistically narrow CIs. Point estimates from random effects meta-analysis and BPP models were similar in the final models, although BPP reflected additional uncertainty as wider credible intervals, particularly when fewer studies were available. Differences in point estimates were seen in iterative updating, weighting approaches, and simulated data. Conclusions: The concept of the BPP can be adapted for synthesizing HSUVs, incorporating expert opinion on relevance. Because of the downweighting of studies, the BPP reflected structural uncertainty as wider credible intervals, with all forms of synthesis showing meaningful differences compared with SPVs. These differences would have implications for both cost-utility point estimates and probabilistic analyses.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Incorporating Prior Beliefs Into Meta-Analyses of Health-State Utility Values Using the Bayesian Power Prior |
Location: | United States |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jval.2023.04.012 |
Publisher version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.04.012 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | © 2023, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Keywords: | Bayesian Power Prior, EQ-5D, utility synthesis |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences > Dept of Statistical Science |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10187399 |
1. | United Kingdom | 6 |
2. | United States | 4 |
3. | China | 2 |
4. | Russian Federation | 2 |
5. | Finland | 1 |
6. | India | 1 |
7. | Vietnam | 1 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |