Arunachalam, Revathi;
Nathwani, Neil;
Nejatian, Touraj;
Fine, Peter;
Leung, Albert;
(2024)
Assessing dentists’ awareness of the orthodontic–restorative interface.
Journal of Dentistry
, 141
, Article 104811. 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104811.
Preview |
PDF
1-s2.0-S0300571223003974-main.pdf - Other Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objectives Awareness of the interface between restorative and orthodontic treatments is essential for dentists to facilitate a meaningful interdisciplinary approach by integrating the knowledge and skills of different dental disciplines into patients’ treatment to enhance outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate General Dental Practitioners’ (GDPs) awareness of the orthodontic–restorative interface. Methods This was a mixed-method study involving the collection of a) quantitative data via a bespoke online questionnaire and b) qualitative data through open questions. A weblink was created to the questionnaire using Opinio®. The questionnaire was distributed to GDPs practising in the UK. Clinical vignette-based questions assessed GDPs awareness and the results were categorised into two groups: aware and unaware. Two months after the primary survey, respondents were sent an email with follow-up (reliability) survey. Reliability responses were compared against the primary responses to assess the repeatability using intraclass correlation coefficient. Data were analysed using independent t-test and X2 test. Results 118 complete responses were received. 63 GDPs (53.4 % [95 % CI 44 %–63 %]) demonstrated a good understanding of the orthodontic–restorative interface. These GDPs were characterised by greater age (t = 2.75, p = 0.007) and experience (t = 3.54, p < 0.001). Qualitative data showed that respondents perceived orthodontic-restorative treatments as minimally invasive and aesthetics enhancing. Conclusions Orthodontic-restorative treatment aids in minimal invasive dentistry. GDPs lack adequate awareness of the orthodontic–restorative interface in relation to patient care and communication with patients. More quality and structured undergraduate and postgraduate training are imperative to facilitate GDPs to understand and utilise aspects of orthodontic-restorative treatments to raise the standard of patient care. Additionally, to support these patients, the educational pathway between GDPs and specialist orthodontists is crucial. Clinical Significance GDPs ability to assess and carry out orthodontic-restorative treatments would conserve natural teeth. Dependable access to orthodontic services would encourage GDPs to refer challenging cases to specialists or dentists with enhanced skills. When the circumstances call for it, patients should be given orthodontic-restorative alternatives, regardless of the potential consequences of their acceptance of the procedures.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
