UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Delirium risk stratification in consecutive unselected admissions to acute medicine: validation of externally derived risk scores

Pendlebury, Sarah T; Lovett, Nicola; Smith, Sarah C; Cornish, Emily; Mehta, Ziyah; Rothwell, Peter M; (2016) Delirium risk stratification in consecutive unselected admissions to acute medicine: validation of externally derived risk scores. Age and Ageing , 45 (1) pp. 60-65. 10.1093/ageing/afv177. Green open access

[thumbnail of Delirium risk stratification in consecutive unselected admissions to acute medicine - validation of externally derived risk scores.pdf]
Preview
Text
Delirium risk stratification in consecutive unselected admissions to acute medicine - validation of externally derived risk scores.pdf - Published Version

Download (343kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: reliable delirium risk stratification will aid recognition, anticipation and prevention and will facilitate targeting of resources in clinical practice as well as identification of at-risk patients for research. Delirium risk scores have been derived for acute medicine, but none has been prospectively validated in external cohorts. We therefore aimed to determine the reliability of externally derived risk scores in a consecutive cohort of older acute medicine patients.// Methods: consecutive patients aged ≥65 over two 8-week periods (2010, 2012) were screened prospectively for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and delirium was diagnosed using the DSM IV criteria. The reliability of existing delirium risk scores derived in acute medicine cohorts and simplified for use in routine clinical practice (USA, n = 2; Spain, n = 1; Indonesia, n = 1) was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Delirium was defined as prevalent (on admission), incident (occurring during admission) and any (prevalent + incident) delirium.// Results: among 308 consecutive patients aged ≥65 (mean age/SD = 81/8 years, 164 (54%) female), existing delirium risk scores had AUCs for delirium similar to those reported in their original internal validations ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 for any delirium and 0.73 to 0.83 for incident delirium. All scores performed better than chance but no one score was clearly superior.// Conclusions: externally derived delirium risk scores performed well in our independent acute medicine population with reliability unaffected by simplification and might therefore facilitate targeting of multicomponent interventions in routine clinical practice.

Type: Article
Title: Delirium risk stratification in consecutive unselected admissions to acute medicine: validation of externally derived risk scores
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afv177
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afv177
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2016, © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Keywords: delirium, prediction, risk stratification, risk scores, acute medicine
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10177155
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item