UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The 2021 Memory Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina–Reconciliation or Polarization?

Barton Hronešová, J; Hasić, J; (2023) The 2021 Memory Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina–Reconciliation or Polarization? Journal of Genocide Research 10.1080/14623528.2023.2205687. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Barton Hronešová_The 2021 Memory Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina Reconciliation or Polarization.pdf]
Preview
Text
Barton Hronešová_The 2021 Memory Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina Reconciliation or Polarization.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

In July 2021, the outgoing international High Representative (HR) of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) imposed a set of amendments to the Criminal Code of BiH, which outlawed the denial of genocide and relativization of war crimes. The decision was largely welcomed by Bosniaks but met with animosity to many in the Bosnian Serb entity and sparked one of the worst crises in post-war BiH. In this article, we demonstrate that because of the manner of the adoption and the legal stipulations, the HR’s decision played straight into the raging BiH memory wars. It exacerbated tensions and distrust in state institutions, rather than contributing to reconciliation and peace as intended. We present a two-pronged argument, aligned with the scholarship that critically assesses external transitional justice. First, we argue that a punitive memory law adopted in such an opaque and elite-driven manner can hardly contribute to reconciliation in a divided post-war context as it does not contribute to an inclusive societal discussion about the past but merely silences the most outrageous dissenters. Second, even the minimal objectives of curbing hate speech and incitements of hatred–which some memory laws achieve–has delivered mixed results in the BiH case due to the poor design and implementation of the law. We showcase how the practical application has stalled, laying bare the weak capacities of state-level institutions, further reducing public trust in their functioning–the opposite of what was declaratively intended.

Type: Article
Title: The 2021 Memory Law in Bosnia and Herzegovina–Reconciliation or Polarization?
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/14623528.2023.2205687
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2023.2205687
Language: English
Additional information: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Keywords: Bosnia and Herzegovina; High Representative; memory law; genocide; relativization; denial
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Arts and Humanities
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > SSEES
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10176292
Downloads since deposit
31Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item