UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A synthetic model simulator for intracranial aneurysm clipping: validation of the UpSurgeOn AneurysmBox

Ahmed, Razna; Muirhead, William; Williams, Simon C; Bagchi, Biswajoy; Datta, Priyankan; Gupta, Priya; Fernandez, Carmen Salvadores; ... Marcus, Hani J; + view all (2023) A synthetic model simulator for intracranial aneurysm clipping: validation of the UpSurgeOn AneurysmBox. Frontiers in Surgery , 10 , Article 1185516. 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1185516. Green open access

[thumbnail of Tiwari_A synthetic model simulator for intracranial aneurysm clipping- validation of the UpSurgeOn AneurysmBox_VoR.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Tiwari_A synthetic model simulator for intracranial aneurysm clipping- validation of the UpSurgeOn AneurysmBox_VoR.pdf - Published Version

Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background and objectives: In recent decades, the rise of endovascular management of aneurysms has led to a significant decline in operative training for surgical aneurysm clipping. Simulation has the potential to bridge this gap and benchtop synthetic simulators aim to combine the best of both anatomical realism and haptic feedback. The aim of this study was to validate a synthetic benchtop simulator for aneurysm clipping (AneurysmBox, UpSurgeOn). Methods: Expert and novice surgeons from multiple neurosurgical centres were asked to clip a terminal internal carotid artery aneurysm using the AneurysmBox. Face and content validity were evaluated using Likert scales by asking experts to complete a post-task questionnaire. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing expert and novice performance using the modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (mOSATS), developing a curriculum-derived assessment of Specific Technical Skills (STS), and measuring the forces exerted using a force-sensitive glove. Results: Ten experts and eighteen novices completed the task. Most experts agreed that the brain looked realistic (8/10), but far fewer agreed that the brain felt realistic (2/10). Half the expert participants (5/10) agreed that the aneurysm clip application task was realistic. When compared to novices, experts had a significantly higher median mOSATS (27 vs. 14.5; p < 0.01) and STS score (18 vs. 9; p < 0.01); the STS score was strongly correlated with the previously validated mOSATS score (p < 0.01). Overall, there was a trend towards experts exerting a lower median force than novices, however, these differences were not statistically significant (3.8 N vs. 4.0 N; p = 0.77). Suggested improvements for the model included reduced stiffness and the addition of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and arachnoid mater. Conclusion: At present, the AneurysmBox has equivocal face and content validity, and future versions may benefit from materials that allow for improved haptic feedback. Nonetheless, it has good construct validity, suggesting it is a promising adjunct to training.

Type: Article
Title: A synthetic model simulator for intracranial aneurysm clipping: validation of the UpSurgeOn AneurysmBox
Location: Switzerland
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1185516
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1185516
Language: English
Additional information: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Keywords: Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Surgery, aneurysm clipping, education, simulation, validation, surgical simulation and training, VALIDITY
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Mechanical Engineering
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10173595
Downloads since deposit
25Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item