UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Benchtop simulation of the retrosigmoid approach: Validation of a surgical simulator and development of a task-specific outcome measure score

Williams, Simon C; Ahmed, Razna; Davids, Joseph Darlington; Funnell, Jonathan P; Hanrahan, John Gerrard; Layard Horsfall, Hugo; Muirhead, William; ... Grover, Patrick; + view all (2023) Benchtop simulation of the retrosigmoid approach: Validation of a surgical simulator and development of a task-specific outcome measure score. World Neurosurgery: X , 20 , Article 100230. 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100230. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S2590139723000790-main.pdf]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S2590139723000790-main.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Neurosurgical training is changing globally. Reduced working hours and training opportunities, increased patient safety expectations, and the impact of COVID-19 have reduced operative exposure. Benchtop simulators enable trainees to develop surgical skills in a controlled environment. We aim to validate a highfidelity simulator model (RetrosigmoidBox, UpSurgeOn) for the retrosigmoid approach to the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Methods: Novice and expert Neurosurgeons and Ear, Nose, and Throat surgeons performed a surgical task using the model – identification of the trigeminal nerve. Experts completed a post-task questionnaire examining face and content validity. Construct validity was assessed through scoring of operative videos employing Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and a novel Task-Specific Outcome Measure score. Results: Fifteen novice and five expert participants were recruited. Forty percent of experts agreed or strongly agreed that the brain tissue looked real. Experts unanimously agreed that the RetrosigmoidBox was appropriate for teaching. Statistically significant differences were noted in task performance between novices and experts, demonstrating construct validity. Median total OSATS score was 14/25 (IQR 10–19) for novices and 22/25 (IQR 20–22) for experts (p < 0.05). Median Task-Specific Outcome Measure score was 10/20 (IQR 7–17) for novices compared to 19/20 (IQR 18.5–19.5) for experts (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The RetrosigmoidBox benchtop simulator has a high degree of content and construct validity and moderate face validity. The changing landscape of neurosurgical training mean that simulators are likely to become increasingly important in the delivery of high-quality education. We demonstrate the validity of a TaskSpecific Outcome Measure score for performance assessment of a simulated approach to the CPA.

Type: Article
Title: Benchtop simulation of the retrosigmoid approach: Validation of a surgical simulator and development of a task-specific outcome measure score
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100230
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100230
Language: English
Additional information: © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Neurosurgery, Education, Model validation, Simulation training, Retrosigmoid craniotomy, Microvascular decompression
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10173527
Downloads since deposit
62Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item