Folkard, Joshua;
Bergson, Ian;
(2023)
Godard v Grey and Schibsby v Westenholz (1870).
In: Merritt, Louise and Day, William, (eds.)
Landmark Cases in Private International Law.
(87-/107).
Hart Publishing: London, UK.
Preview |
Text
9781509952649_Landmark Cases in Private International Law, 04.pdf - Other Download (282kB) | Preview |
Abstract
THIS CHAPTER CONSIDERS the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, and specifically the ‘ obligation theory ’ underpinning the common law rules which clearly emerged in the nineteenth century in the twin cases of Godard v Gray and Schibsby v Westenholz . 1 The chapter is structured as follows: ( I ) we first address the decisions in Godard and Schibsby and the obligation theory itself; ( II ) we then put the domestic common law in context and consider developments in other jurisdictions (including most notably Canada), which have diverged from the English approach; ( III ) we argue that the obligation theory struggles to explain the current positive law of England and Wales; and ( IV ) we draw the threads together by way of conclusion and draw on our survey of the foreign jurisprudence to reinforce our conclusions on Godard and Schibsby.
Type: | Book chapter |
---|---|
Title: | Godard v Grey and Schibsby v Westenholz (1870) |
ISBN-13: | 9781509952649 |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Publisher version: | https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/landmark-cases-in-pr... |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Conflict of Laws |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10173403 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |