UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A three protein signature fails to externally validate as a biomarker to predict surgical outcome in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer

Hawarden, Amy; Price, Marcus; Russell, Bryn; Wilson, Godfrey; Farrelly, Laura; Embleton-Thirsk, Andrew; Parmar, Mahesh; (2023) A three protein signature fails to externally validate as a biomarker to predict surgical outcome in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer. PLoS ONE , 18 (3) , Article e0281798. 10.1371/journal.pone.0281798. Green open access

[thumbnail of Hawarden et al. - 2023 - A three protein signature fails to externally vali.pdf]
Preview
Text
Hawarden et al. - 2023 - A three protein signature fails to externally vali.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: For patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, complete surgical cytoreduction remains the strongest predictor of outcome. However, identifying patients who are likely to benefit from such surgery remains elusive and to date few surgical outcome prediction tools have been validated. Here we attempted to externally validate a promising three protein signature, which had previously shown strong association with suboptimal surgical debulking (AUC 0.89, accuracy 92.8%), (Riester, M., et al., (2014)). / Methods:238 high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer samples were collected from patients who participated in a large multicentre trial (ICON5). Samples were collected at the time of initial surgery and before randomisation. Surgical outcome data were collated from prospectively collected study records. Immunohistochemical scores were generated by two independent observers for the three proteins in the original signature (POSTN, CXCL14 and pSmad2/3). Predictive values were generated for individual and combination protein signatures. / Results: When assessed individually, none of the proteins showed any evidence of predictive affinity for suboptimal surgical outcome in our cohort (AUC POSTN 0.55, pSmad 2/3 0.53, CXCL 14 0.62). The combined signature again showed poor predictive ability with an AUC 0.58. / Conclusions: Despite showing original promise, when this protein signature is applied to a large external cohort, it is unable to accurately predict surgical outcomes. This could be attributed to overfitting of the original model, or differences in surgical practice between cohorts.

Type: Article
Title: A three protein signature fails to externally validate as a biomarker to predict surgical outcome in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281798
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281798
Language: English
Additional information: © 2023 Hawarden et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Keywords: Surgical and invasive medical procedures, Cancer and neoplasms, Ovarian cancer, Immunohistochemistry techniques, Surgical oncology, Biomarkers, Cell staining, Forecasting
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Inst of Clinical Trials and Methodology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Inst of Clinical Trials and Methodology > Comprehensive CTU at UCL
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10167232
Downloads since deposit
14Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item