UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Reforming the insanity defence in England and Wales

Dsouza, Mark; Ormerod, David; (2023) Reforming the insanity defence in England and Wales. In: Mackay, Ronnie and Brookbanks, Warren, (eds.) The insanity defence: international and comparative perspectives. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. (In press).

[thumbnail of Dsouza_Chapter for Mackay et al.pdf] Text
Dsouza_Chapter for Mackay et al.pdf
Access restricted to UCL open access staff

Download (342kB)


English law’s insanity defence has been subjected to sustained and cogent criticism. It is outdated in its understanding of psychiatry and was devised for trial procedures that are unrecognizable to those familiar with modern day practice. The defence is little used but has generated a disproportionate number of appeals. It creates arbitrary distinctions in application by its requirement for a ‘disease of the mind’, and its relationship with sane automatism and pleas based on intoxication is complex and incoherent. Controversially it imposes a legal burden of proof on the defendant. The scope for reform is obvious. With an increasingly enlightened attitude to mental health issues in the criminal justice system, there is an opportunity for law reform to create a defence which deals fairly and equitably with mentally disordered offenders. The Law Commission for England and Wales—whose statutory function is to ensure that the law is as fair, modern, and simple as possible—examined the defence and prepared a discussion paper tentatively proposing a new defence for someone ‘not criminally responsible by reason of medical condition’. This chapter explores the Commission’s work and assesses the prospects for further reform and legislation.

Type: Book chapter
Title: Reforming the insanity defence in England and Wales
ISBN-13: 9780198854944
Publisher version: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-insani...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: law reform, insanity defence, Law Commission Discussion Paper, not criminally responsible, qualifying recognized medical condition
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10157700
Downloads since deposit
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item