UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment studies of five key health behaviours

Perski, Olga; Keller, Jan; Kale, Dimitra; Asare, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah; Schneider, Verena; Powell, Daniel; Naughton, Felix; ... Kwasnicka, Dominika; + view all (2022) Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment studies of five key health behaviours. Health Psychology Review , 16 (4) pp. 576-601. 10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258. Green open access

[thumbnail of Perski_Understanding health behaviours in context A systematic review and meta analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies of five key health.pdf]
Preview
Text
Perski_Understanding health behaviours in context A systematic review and meta analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies of five key health.pdf

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) involves repeated, real-time sampling of health behaviours in context. We present the state-of-knowledge in EMA research focused on five key health behaviours (physical activity and sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, sexual health), summarising theoretical (e.g., psychological and contextual predictors) and methodological aspects (e.g., study characteristics, EMA adherence). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science until February 2021. We included studies focused on any of the aforementioned health behaviours in adult, non-clinical populations that assessed ≥1 psychological/contextual predictor and reported a predictor-behaviour association. A narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses of EMA adherence were conducted. We included 633 studies. The median study duration was 14 days. The most frequently assessed predictors were 'negative feeling states' (21%) and 'motivation and goals' (16.5%). The pooled percentage of EMA adherence was high at 81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, k=348) and did not differ by target behaviour but was somewhat higher in student (vs. general) samples, when EMAs were delivered via mobile phones (vs. handheld devices), and when event contingent (vs. fixed) sampling was used. This review showcases how the EMA method has been applied to improve understanding and prediction of health behaviours in context.

Type: Article
Title: Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment studies of five key health behaviours
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Ecological Momentary Assessment, ambulatory assessment, experience sampling, health psychology, meta-analysis, systematic review
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10154834
Downloads since deposit
12Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item