Prentice, Freya; Hobson, Hannah; Spooner, Ria; Murphy, Jennifer; (2022) Gender differences in interoceptive accuracy and emotional ability: An explanation for incompatible findings. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , 141 , Article 104808. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104808.

Preview

Text Prentice_1-s2.0-S0149763422002974-main.pdf Download (465kB) | Preview

Abstract

Most theories of emotion describe a crucial role for interoceptive accuracy, the perception of the body’s internal physiological signals, in emotional experience. Despite support for interoceptive accuracy’s role in emotion, findings of gender differences in emotional and interoceptive processing are incompatible with theory; women typically show poorer interoceptive accuracy, but women often outperform men on measures of emotional processing and recognition. This suggests a need to re-evaluate the relationship between interoceptive accuracy and emotion considering sex and gender. Here we extend Pennebaker and Roberts’ (1992) theory of gender differences in the use of interoceptive signals for emotional experience, proposing that language socialisation may result in gender differences in the propensity to label internal state changes as physiological or emotional, respectively. Despite outstanding questions concerning the fractionation of interoceptive and emotional domains, this theory provides a plausible explanation for seemingly incompatible findings of gender differences in interoceptive and emotional abilities.

Download activity - last month

Export as JSONCSVXML

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item