UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Migrants’ primary care utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: An interrupted time series analysis

Zhang, Claire X; Boukari, Yamina; Pathak, Neha; Mathur, Rohini; Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal; Patel, Parth; Campos-Matos, Ines; ... Aldridge, Robert W; + view all (2022) Migrants’ primary care utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: An interrupted time series analysis. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe , 20 , Article 100455. 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100455. Green open access

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S2666776222001491-main.pdf]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S2666776222001491-main.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: How international migrants access and use primary care in England is poorly understood. We aimed to compare primary care consultation rates between international migrants and non-migrants in England before and during the COVID–19 pandemic (2015–2020). // Methods: Using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD, we identified migrants using country-of-birth, visa-status or other codes indicating international migration. We linked CPRD to Office for National Statistics deprivation data and ran a controlled interrupted time series (ITS) using negative binomial regression to compare rates before and during the pandemic. // Findings: In 262,644 individuals, pre-pandemic consultation rates per person-year were 4.35 (4.34–4.36) for migrants and 4.60 (4.59–4.60) for non-migrants (RR:0.94 [0.92–0.96]). Between 29 March and 26 December 2020, rates reduced to 3.54 (3.52–3.57) for migrants and 4.2 (4.17–4.23) for non-migrants (RR:0.84 [0.8–0.88]). The first year of the pandemic was associated with a widening of the gap in consultation rates between migrants and non-migrants to 0.89 (95% CI 0.84–0.94) times the ratio before the pandemic. This widening in ratios was greater for children, individuals whose first language was not English, and individuals of White British, White non-British and Black/African/Caribbean/Black British ethnicities. It was also greater in the case of telephone consultations, particularly in London. // Interpretation: Migrants were less likely to use primary care than non-migrants before the pandemic and the first year of the pandemic exacerbated this difference. As GP practices retain remote and hybrid models of service delivery, they must improve services and ensure primary care is accessible and responsive to migrants’ healthcare needs.

Type: Article
Title: Migrants’ primary care utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: An interrupted time series analysis
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100455
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100455
Language: English
Additional information: © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Keywords: igrant; Primary care; Consultation; General practice; COVID-19; Healthcare utilisation; Healthcare access
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Population, Policy and Practice Dept
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Health Informatics
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10151732
Downloads since deposit
21Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item