UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Clinical outcomes of a trifocal compared with an EDOF IOL following bilateral cataract surgery

Scheepers, Marius A; Bunce, Catey B; Michaelides, Michel; Hall, Brad; (2022) Clinical outcomes of a trifocal compared with an EDOF IOL following bilateral cataract surgery. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.05.005. (In press).

[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript] Text (Accepted manuscript)
Michaelides_Trifocal-EDOF Manuscript word(CJO)_revisions2.pdf
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 24 December 2022.

Download (822kB)
[thumbnail of Figure 1] Image (Figure 1)
Michaelides_Figure 1.tiff
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 24 December 2022.

Download (486kB)
[thumbnail of Figure 2] Image (Figure 2)
Michaelides_Figure 2.tiff
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 24 December 2022.

Download (505kB)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the visual and patient reported outcomes of 2 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: A total of 134 eyes (67 patients) that underwent cataract surgery with either a trifocal IOL or an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL bilaterally and were assessed 3 months after surgery. Outcome measures were binocular distance-corrected visual acuity at near (40 cm), intermediate (60 cm), and distance (6 m); Akman modified Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire-14; and 10% contrast visual acuity at distance and near, with and without glare. RESULTS: Mean binocular logMAR visual acuity (VA) for the PanOptix compared with the Symfony lenses: distance-corrected near VA, 0.054 versus 0.228; distance-corrected intermediate VA, 0.019 versus 0.063; and distance-corrected distance VA, -0.016 versus -0.021. The QOL questionnaire showed that 62% of the PanOptix group and 48% of the Symfony group had little or no difficulty with all QOL-related tasks. In a multivariable model controlling for pupil size and angle kappa (chord mu distance, right eyes), the differences were -0.005 (range, -0.03-0.02) and 0.165 (range, 0.12-0.21), respectively. Also, 10% contrast acuity was comparable in the 2 different lenses and was unaffected by glare. CONCLUSIONS: Binocular distance-corrected near VA was significantly better in the PanOptix group (p < 0.0001). This result remained statistically significant after controlling for pupil size and chord mu distance (p < 0.001). Intermediate and distance VAs were similar between the 2 groups. QOL scores were higher in the PanOptix group.

Type: Article
Title: Clinical outcomes of a trifocal compared with an EDOF IOL following bilateral cataract surgery
Location: England
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.05.005
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.05.005
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Ophthalmology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10150745
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item