Kuleindiren, Narayan; Rifkin-Zybutz, Raphael Paul; Johal, Monika; Selim, Hamzah; Palmon, Itai; Lin, Aaron; Yu, Yizhou; ... Mahmud, Mohammad; + view all Kuleindiren, Narayan; Rifkin-Zybutz, Raphael Paul; Johal, Monika; Selim, Hamzah; Palmon, Itai; Lin, Aaron; Yu, Yizhou; Alim-Marvasti, Ali; Mahmud, Mohammad; - view fewer (2022) Optimizing Existing Mental Health Screening Methods in a Dementia Screening and Risk Factor App: Observational Machine Learning Study. JMIR Formative Research , 6 (3) , Article e31209. 10.2196/31209.

Preview

Text Alim-Marvasti_Optimizing Existing Mental Health Screening Methods in a Dementia Screening and Risk Factor App_VoR.pdf - Published Version Download (697kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mindstep is an app that aims to improve dementia screening by assessing cognition and risk factors. It considers important clinical risk factors, including prodromal symptoms, mental health disorders, and differential diagnoses of dementia. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire for depression (PHQ-9) and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) are widely validated and commonly used scales used in screening for depression and anxiety disorders, respectively. Shortened versions of both (PHQ-2/GAD-2) have been produced. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a method that maintained the brevity of these shorter questionnaires while maintaining the better precision of the original questionnaires. METHODS: Single questions were designed to encompass symptoms covered in the original questionnaires. Answers to these questions were combined with PHQ-2/GAD-2, and anonymized risk factors were collected by Mindset4Dementia from 2235 users. Machine learning models were trained to use these single questions in combination with data already collected by the app: age, response to a joke, and reporting of functional impairment to predict binary and continuous outcomes as measured using PHQ-9/GAD-7. Our model was developed with a training data set by using 10-fold cross-validation and a holdout testing data set and compared to results from using the shorter questionnaires (PHQ-2/GAD-2) alone to benchmark performance. RESULTS: We were able to achieve superior performance in predicting PHQ-9/GAD-7 screening cutoffs compared to PHQ-2 (difference in area under the curve 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.08, P=.02) but not GAD-2 (difference in area under the curve 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.03, P=.42). Regression models were able to accurately predict total questionnaire scores in PHQ-9 (R2=0.655, mean absolute error=2.267) and GAD-7 (R2=0.837, mean absolute error=1.780). CONCLUSIONS: We app-adapted PHQ-4 by adding brief summary questions about factors normally covered in the longer questionnaires. We additionally trained machine learning models that used the wide range of additional information already collected in Mindstep to make a short app-based screening tool for affective disorders, which appears to have superior or equivalent performance to well-established methods.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as JSONCSVXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item