Groenendijk, A;
van Tinteren, H;
Jiang, Y;
de Krijger, RR;
Vujanic, GM;
Godzinski, J;
Rübe, C;
... Mavinkurve-Groothuis, AMC; + view all
(2022)
Outcome of SIOP patients with low- or intermediate-risk Wilms tumour relapsing after initial vincristine and actinomycin-D therapy only − the SIOP 93–01 and 2001 protocols.
European Journal of Cancer
, 163
pp. 88-97.
10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.014.
Preview |
Text
Pritchard-Jones_1-s2.0-S0959804921012855-main.pdf Download (554kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Purpose: Society of International Pediatric Oncology – Renal Tumor Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) treatment recommendations for relapsed Wilms tumour (WT) are stratified by the intensity of first-line treatment. To explore the evidence for the treatment of patients relapsing after vincristine and actinomycin-D (VA) treatment for primary WT, we retrospectively evaluated rescue treatment and survival of this patient group. Patients and methods: We included 109 patients with relapse after VA therapy (no radiotherapy) for stage I-II primary low- or intermediate-risk WT from the SIOP 93–01 and SIOP 2001 studies. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to study the effect of relapse treatment intensity on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Relapse treatment intensity was classified into vincristine, actinomycin-D, and either doxorubicin or epirubicin (VAD), and more intensive therapies (ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide [ICE]/≥ 4 drugs/high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HD HSCT]). Results: Relapse treatment regimens included either VAD, or cyclophosphamide/carboplatin/etoposide/doxorubicin (CyCED), or ICE backbones. Radiotherapy was administered in 62 patients and HD HSCT in 15 patients. Overall, 5-year EFS and OS after relapse were 72.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.0–81.6%) and 79.3% (95% CI: 71.5–88.0%), respectively. Patients treated with VAD did not fare worse when compared with patients treated with more intensive therapies (hazard ratio EFS: 0.611 [95% CI: 0.228–1.638] [p-value = 0.327] and hazard ratio OS: 0.438 [95% CI: 0.126–1.700] [p-value = 0.193]). Conclusion: Patients with relapsed WT after initial VA-only treatment showed no inferior EFS and OS when treated with VAD regimens compared with more intensive rescue regimens. A subset of patients relapsing after VA may benefit from less intensive rescue treatment than ICE/CyCED-based regimens and deserve to be pinpointed by identifying additional (molecular) prognostic factors in future studies.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Outcome of SIOP patients with low- or intermediate-risk Wilms tumour relapsing after initial vincristine and actinomycin-D therapy only − the SIOP 93–01 and 2001 protocols |
Location: | England |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.014 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.014 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
Keywords: | Recurrence, SIOP protocol, Treatment outcome, Wilms tumour |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Developmental Biology and Cancer Dept UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10144328 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |