Lee, S;
Esteve, M;
(2023)
What drives the perceived legitimacy of collaborative governance? An experimental study.
Public Management Review
, 25
(8)
pp. 1517-1538.
10.1080/14719037.2022.2026692.
Preview |
Text
CG Legitimacy_PMR FINAL REVISION with author details.pdf - Accepted Version Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study explores the perceived legitimacy of collaborative governance from a citizens’ perspective. We use a preregistered online survey experiment to test the effect of three factors – representation, performance information, and issue complexity – on the perceived legitimacy of a collaboration. Findings show that representation and positive performance information influence citizens’ perceptions of collaborative governance legitimacy, while issue complexity has little impact. Additionally, heterogeneous treatment effects were found: respondents with low trust in public organizations factor representation more into their legitimacy perceptions of collaborative governance, while those with high trust in public organizations show little influence of representation.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | What drives the perceived legitimacy of collaborative governance? An experimental study |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
DOI: | 10.1080/14719037.2022.2026692 |
Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2026692 |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Legitimacy; collaborative governance; survey experiment; representation; performance information |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Political Science |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10141575 |
Archive Staff Only
View Item |