UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Tiered restrictions for COVID-19 in England: knowledge, motivation, and self-reported behaviour

Smith, LE; Potts, HWW; Amlȏt, R; Fear, NT; Michie, S; Rubin, GJ; (2022) Tiered restrictions for COVID-19 in England: knowledge, motivation, and self-reported behaviour. Public Health 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.12.016. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Smith Potts 2022 Tiered restrictions.pdf]
Preview
Text
Smith Potts 2022 Tiered restrictions.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (11MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives: To test whether public knowledge and confidence in one’s understanding of the local restrictions, motivation to adhere to local restrictions, and self-reported behaviour (going out for exercise; to work; socially) differed according to tier level. Study design: Cross-sectional nationally representative online survey of 1728 participants living in England (data collection: 26 to 28 October 2020). Methods: We conducted logistic regression analyses to investigate whether knowledge of restrictions, confidence in knowledge of restrictions, motivation to adhere to restrictions, and self-reported behaviour were associated with personal characteristics and tier. Results: Between 81% (tier 2) and 89% (tier 3) of participants correctly identified which tier they lived in. Knowledge of specific restrictions was variable. 73% were confident they understood which tier was in place in their local area, while 71% were confident they understood the guidance in their local area. Confidence was associated with being older and living in a less deprived area. 73% were motivated to adhere to restrictions in their local area. Motivation was associated with being female and older. People living in tiers with greater restrictions were less likely to report going out to meet people from another household socially; reported rates of going out for exercise and for work did not differ. Conclusions: While recognition of local tier level was high, knowledge of specific guidance for tiers was variable. There was some indication that nuanced guidance (e.g. behaviour allowed in some settings but not others) was more poorly understood than guidance which was absolute (i.e. behaviour is either allowed or not allowed).

Type: Article
Title: Tiered restrictions for COVID-19 in England: knowledge, motivation, and self-reported behaviour
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.12.016
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.12.016
Language: English
Additional information: © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Keywords: COVID-19, adherence, restrictions, guidance, physical distancing, social distancing
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Health Informatics
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Health Informatics > CHIME
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10141442
Downloads since deposit
29Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item