UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The effect of remotely delivered lifestyle interventions on cognition in older adults without dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Whitfield, T; McConnell, B; Renouf, P; Mansour, H; Zabihi, S; Aguirre, E; Walker, Z; ... Marchant, NL; + view all (2021) The effect of remotely delivered lifestyle interventions on cognition in older adults without dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews , 72 , Article 101505. 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101505. Green open access

[thumbnail of Remote_Interventions_Systematic_Review_Revised_Clean.pdf]
Preview
Text
Remote_Interventions_Systematic_Review_Revised_Clean.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (564kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Whitfield_Remote_Interventions_Systematic_Review_SUPPL_Revised.pdf]
Preview
Text
Whitfield_Remote_Interventions_Systematic_Review_SUPPL_Revised.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (603kB) | Preview

Abstract

Up to 40% of dementias may be preventable via risk factor modification. This inference has motivated the development of lifestyle interventions for reducing cognitive decline. Typically delivered to older adults face-to-face, the COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated their adaptation for remote delivery. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of remotely delivered lifestyle interventions (≥4 weeks duration and delivered >50% remotely), for adults aged ≥ 60 without dementia, examining effects on objective cognitive measures. Comparators were active (face-to-face or remote) or passive. Ten studies (n = 2967) comprising multidomain (k = 4), physical activity (k = 3) or psychosocial (k = 3) remote interventions were included. Data were synthesized using robust variance estimation meta-analysis. The pooled estimate comparing the effect of remote interventions versus comparators on cognition was not significant (g=-0.02; 95%CI [-0.14, 0.09]; p = .66); subgroup analyses by type of intervention or comparator also yielded non-significant effects. Most studies had low risk of bias. Current evidence to support remote lifestyle interventions is limited. Included studies were conducted pre-pandemic, and evaluated individual, rather than group interventions. Future studies may exploit the greater digital connectivity of older people since the pandemic. Group formats, more frequently efficacious than individual interventions in face-to-face dementia prevention trials, may be a rational approach for future remote trials.

Type: Article
Title: The effect of remotely delivered lifestyle interventions on cognition in older adults without dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101505
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101505
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Cognitive function, Dementia, Mild cognitive impairment, Prevention, Randomized controlled trial, Remote delivery
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Division of Psychiatry
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10139123
Downloads since deposit
146Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item