UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Free-of-charge medicine schemes in the NHS: A local and regional drug and therapeutic committee's experience

O'Callaghan, S; Ferner, RE; Barron, A; Saxby, K; Sofat, R; (2021) Free-of-charge medicine schemes in the NHS: A local and regional drug and therapeutic committee's experience. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 10.1111/bcp.15094. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Sofat_Free-of-charge medicine schemes in the NHS_AOP.pdf]
Preview
Text
Sofat_Free-of-charge medicine schemes in the NHS_AOP.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Free-of-charge (FoC) medicine schemes are increasingly available and allow access to investigational treatments outside clinical trials or in advance of licensing or NHS commissioning. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed FoC medicine schemes evaluated between 2013 and 2019 by a single NHS trust and a regional drug and therapeutics committee (DTC). The details of each locally reviewed FoC scheme, and any nationally available Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Early Access to Medicines Scheme (MHRA EAMS) in the same period, were recorded and categorised. RESULTS: Most FoC schemes (95%) allowed access to medicines intended to address an unmet clinical need. Over 7 years, 90% were company-FoC schemes and 10% were MHRA EAMS that were locally reviewed. Phase 3 clinical trial data were available for 44% of FoC schemes, 37% had phase 2 data and 19% were supported only by phase 1 data, retrospective observational studies or preclinical data. Utilisation of company-FoC schemes increased on average by 50% per year, while MHRA EAMS schemes showed little growth. CONCLUSION: Company-FoC medicine schemes are increasingly common. This may indicate a preference for pharmaceutical companies to independently co-ordinate schemes. Motivations for company-FoC schemes remain unclear and many provide access to treatments that are yet to be evaluated in appropriately conducted clinical trials, and whose efficacy and risk of harm remain uncertain. There is no standardisation of this practice and there is no regulatory oversight. Moreover, no standardised data collection framework is in place that could demonstrate the utility of such programmes in addressing unmet clinical need or to allow generation of further evidence.

Type: Article
Title: Free-of-charge medicine schemes in the NHS: A local and regional drug and therapeutic committee's experience
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15094
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15094
Language: English
Additional information: © 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Keywords: access schemes, early access schemes, evidence based medicine, expanded access schemes, drug and therapeutic committee, drug approval, Free of charge schemes, health policy, medicine governance, service provision
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Health Informatics
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Health Informatics > Clinical Epidemiology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10138481
Downloads since deposit
107Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item