UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Pilot randomised controlled trial of the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) as a tool for targeting health communications

Perski, O; Stevens, C; West, R; Shahab, L; (2021) Pilot randomised controlled trial of the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) as a tool for targeting health communications. PLoS One , 16 (11) , Article e0259949. 10.1371/journal.pone.0259949. Green open access

[thumbnail of Perski_Pilot randomised controlled trial of the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) as a tool for targeting health communications_VoR.pdf]
Preview
Text
Perski_Pilot randomised controlled trial of the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) as a tool for targeting health communications_VoR.pdf

Download (741kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improving adherence to self-protective behaviours is a public health priority. We aimed to assess the potential effectiveness and ease of use of an online version of the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) in promoting help-seeking for cigarette smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, insufficient physical activity, or low fruit and vegetable consumption. METHODS: 843 UK adults were recruited, of whom 602 engaged in at least one risky behaviour. Those with no immediate plans to change (n = 171) completed a behaviour specific RAL. Participants were randomised to one of two conditions; a short message congruent (on-target, n = 73) or incongruent (off-target, n = 98) with their RAL response. Performance of the RAL was assessed by participants’ ability to select an applicable RAL item and reported ease of use of the RAL. Effectiveness was assessed by whether or not participants clicked a link to receive information about changing their target behaviour. RESULTS: Two thirds (68.9%, 95% CI = 61.8%-75.3%) of participants were able to select an applicable RAL item that corresponded to what they believed would need to change in order to alter their target behaviour, with 64.9% (95% CI = 57.5%-71.7%) reporting that it was easy to select one option. Compared with the off-target group, participants allocated to the on-target group had greater odds of clicking on the link to receive information (31.5% vs 19.4%; OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.01–4.26). CONCLUSION: The Risk Acceptance Ladder may have utility as a tool for tailoring messages to prompt initial steps to engaging in self-protective behaviours.

Type: Article
Title: Pilot randomised controlled trial of the Risk Acceptance Ladder (RAL) as a tool for targeting health communications
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259949
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259949
Language: English
Additional information: © 2021 Perski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Behavioural Science and Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10137861
Downloads since deposit
14Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item