Green, F; (2017) Legitimate Expectations, Legal Transitions, and Wide Reflective Equilibrium. Moral Philosophy and Politics , 4 (2) pp. 177-205. 10.1515/mopp-2016-0029.

Preview

Text Green_10.1515_mopp-2016-0029.pdf - Published Version Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Recent scholarly attention to 'legitimate expectations' and their role in legal transitions has yielded widely varying principles for distinguishing between legitimate and non-legitimate expectations. This article suggests that methodological reflection may facilitate substantive progress in the debate. Specifically, it proposes and defends the use of a wide reflective equilibrium methodology for constructing, justifying and critiquing theories of legitimate expectations and other kinds of normative theories about legal transitions. The methodology involves three levels of analysis - normative principles, their theoretical antecedents, and considered judgements about their implications in specific cases - and iteration between these three levels in an effort to ensure coherence. The payoffs from applying this methodology to the legitimate expectations debate are illustrated through a discussion of examples from the existing literature. Some proposed innovations to the methodology, including the incorporation of insights from the ideal/non-ideal theory debate, are likely to be of wider interest to political theorists.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as JSONCSVXML

Archive Staff Only

View Item