Kelly, R;
(2022)
Criminalising dissent.
Law Quarterly Review
, 138
pp. 432-455.
Preview |
Text
Kelly_Kelly - Criminalising Dissent (accepted) 1.11.21.pdf - Accepted Version Download (331kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Considers whether judges in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division are entitled to dissent if they disagree with the majority. Reviews the court's role, the circumstances in which dissent may be justified, its potential benefits, the arguments against it, and whether other alternatives are available.
Type: | Article |
---|---|
Title: | Criminalising dissent |
Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
Publisher version: | http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/Product... |
Language: | English |
Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
Keywords: | Court of Appeal; Courts' powers and duties; Criminal appeals; Dissenting judgments |
UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws |
URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10137415 |
Downloads since deposit
156Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months
Archive Staff Only
View Item |