UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Best clinical practice guidance for conscious sedation of children undergoing dental treatment: an EAPD policy document

Ashley, P; Anand, P; Andersson, K; (2021) Best clinical practice guidance for conscious sedation of children undergoing dental treatment: an EAPD policy document. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 10.1007/s40368-021-00660-z. (In press). Green open access

[thumbnail of Ashley2021_Article_BestClinicalPracticeGuidanceFo.pdf]
Preview
Text
Ashley2021_Article_BestClinicalPracticeGuidanceFo.pdf - Published Version

Download (780kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Supplement v1.pdf]
Preview
Text
Supplement v1.pdf - Published Version

Download (247kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to fear and/or behaviour management problems, some children are unable to cooperate for dental treatment using local anaesthesia and psychological support alone. Sedation is required for these patients in order for dentists to be able to deliver high quality, pain-free dental care. The aim of this guideline is to evaluate the efficacy and relative efficacy of conscious sedation agents and dosages for behaviour management in paediatric dentistry and to provide guidance as to which sedative agents should be used. METHODS: These guidelines were developed using a multi-step approach adapted from that outlined by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE (2020) Developing NICE Guidelines: the manual. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg20/chapter/introduction#main-stages-of-guideline-development. Accessed 7 Oct 2020). Evidence for this guideline was provided from a pre-existing Cochrane review (Ashley et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD003877, 2018) supplemented by an updated search and data extraction up to May 2020. RESULTS: Studies were from 18 different countries and had recruited 4131 participants overall with an average of 70 participants per study. Ages ranged from 0 to 16 years with an average age of 5.6 years across all included studies. A wide variety of drugs or combinations of drugs (n = 38) were used and delivered orally, intranasally, intravenously, rectally, intramuscularly, submucosally, transmucosally or by inhalation sedation. Twenty-four different outcome measures for behaviour were used. The wide range of drug combinations and outcome measures used greatly complicated description and analysis of the data. CONCLUSION: Oral midazolam is recommended for conscious dental sedation. Midazolam delivered via other methods or nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation could be considered, but the evidence for both was very low.

Type: Article
Title: Best clinical practice guidance for conscious sedation of children undergoing dental treatment: an EAPD policy document
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1007/s40368-021-00660-z
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00660-z
Language: English
Additional information: © 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Sedation, Dental, Paediatric, Midazolam, Nitrous oxide
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute > EDI Craniofacial and Development Sci
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10133896
Downloads since deposit
79Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item