UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Counterfactual arguments in unjust enrichment

Connolly, N; (2020) Counterfactual arguments in unjust enrichment. The Cambridge Law Journal , 79 (3) pp. 408-411. 10.1017/S0008197320000689. Green open access

[thumbnail of Connolly_Counterfactual arguments as submitted.pdf]
Preview
Text
Connolly_Counterfactual arguments as submitted.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (99kB) | Preview

Abstract

IN Vodafone Ltd. and Others v Office of Communications [2020] EWCA Civ 183, the Court of Appeal has considered – and rejected – counterfactual arguments advanced by the defendant in an unjust enrichment action grounded on the Woolwich unjust factor.

Type: Article
Title: Counterfactual arguments in unjust enrichment
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1017/S0008197320000689
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197320000689
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10131546
Downloads since deposit
136Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item