Lawes-Wickwar, S;
Lovat, E;
Aloa, A;
Hamer-Hunt, J;
Yurtoglu, N;
Jensen, C;
Clarke, N;
... Park, S; + view all
(2021)
Technology-delivered undergraduate medical education involving patients and carers: A rapid systematic review.
MedRxiv: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Preview |
Text
Technology PPI.pdf - Submitted Version Download (420kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Involving patients and carers in medical education centralises their voice in healthcare and supports students to develop key professional and person-centred skills. Medical schools are increasingly using technology to deliver educational activities. No review currently exists to establish the variety of technologies and their uses in undergraduate medical education when patients and/or carers are involved. / Methods: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE and medRxiv were searched in October 2020 and reference lists of key articles were hand searched. Eligible studies reported technology-assisted education, in any setting, involving authentic patients and/or carers. Studies in foreign languages, or describing actors or non-authentic patients were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Levels of patient involvement were assessed using Towle et al (2010) taxonomy. / Results: Twenty studies were included. The majority involved patients and/or carers via pre-recorded videos or online scenarios, with no student-interaction. Four studies evaluated remote consultations using telehealth technology, involving real-time interactions with authentic patients. Technology-supported teaching sessions involving patients and/or carers were found to be acceptable to students, educationally valuable (to students and educators), and enhanced student engagement, patient-centred attitudes, knowledge of specific patient groups, and communication and clinical skills. Two studies describing real-time remote interactions with authentic patients indicated potential barriers for students (reduced ability to build relationship with patients and examine them), educators (reduced ability to build rapport with students) and patients (issues with using or accessing telehealth). / Conclusions: No studies directly measured the perspective of patients or carers involved in technology-delivered medical education. Future research should establish barriers and facilitators to patients and carers taking up a role in medical students education when technology is used, and evaluate PPI activities at Levels 3 and above as described by Towle et al taxonomy.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
