UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Investigating the impact of systematic reviews funded by DFID

Oliver, S; Anand, K; Bangpan, M; (2020) Investigating the impact of systematic reviews funded by DFID. EPPI Centre, Social Research Institute, UCL: London, UK. Green open access

[thumbnail of Impact_of_SR_DFID_FINAL_1.pdf]
Preview
Text
Impact_of_SR_DFID_FINAL_1.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Systematic reviews for international development originated 20 years ago. In 2010 the Department for International Development (DFID) introduced a programme of systematic reviews with a capacity building element that spanned multiple policy sectors. This study traces the impact of these systematic reviews both in the academic research literature and beyond academia, by looking at use within government and other organisations (for example through inclusion in documents, research repositories and decisions beyond academia). Systematic reviews were cited more often in academia than beyond, some for their substantive findings, and some for methodological debate. Beyond academia, of the 86 systematic reviews: 21 informed specific decisions or policies, 25 were cited to enhance understanding, one informed new procedures for embedding evidence in decision making, 19 appeared in existing procedures for decision making, and 21 appeared in portals, maps or databases to enhance knowledge accessibility. Reviews were used by academics (69 reviews), government (20), review advisors (2), other stakeholders (37), or none (14). Three models of knowledge exchange can explain how use of these systematic reviews beyond academia was achieved. Clearly communicated policy implications may lead to greater use for policy decisions (linear model of knowledge transfer). Greater involvement of policy teams in focusing and reporting the review may lead to reviews appearing more relevant beyond academia (relationship model). Organisations using multiple systematic reviews may be distinctive in terms of their investment in capacity of individuals, teams, institutions and a global support system for systematic reviews (dynamic systems model). The three models potentially overlap: a dynamic evidence system supporting policy input may lead to more relevant reviews with clearer implications for policy. Investment in systems and relationships to support the production of systematic reviews looks promising for systematic reviews that provide clearer implications for policy and greater use beyond academia.

Type: Report
Title: Investigating the impact of systematic reviews funded by DFID
ISBN-13: 978-1-911605-16-4
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
Publisher version: https://www.gov.uk/research-for-development-output...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the version of record. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education > IOE - Social Research Institute
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10124719
Downloads since deposit
24Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item