UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial

Moreno-Peral, P; Conejo-Cerón, S; de Dios Luna, J; King, M; Nazareth, I; Martín-Pérez, C; Fernández-Alonso, C; ... predictD group; + view all (2021) Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial. British Journal of General Practice , 71 (703) e95-e104. 10.3399/bjgp20X714041. Green open access

[thumbnail of e95.full.pdf]
Preview
Text
e95.full.pdf - Published Version

Download (137kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: In the predictD-intervention, GPs used a personalised biopsychosocial programme to prevent depression. This reduced the incidence of major depression by 21.0%, although the results were not statistically significant. Aim: To determine whether the predictD-intervention is effective at preventing anxiety in primary care patients without depression or anxiety. Design and setting: Secondary study of a cluster randomised trial with practices randomly assigned to either the predictD-intervention or usual care. This study was conducted in seven Spanish cities from October 2010 to July 2012. Method: In each city, 10 practices and two GPs per practice, as well as four to six patients every recruiting day, were randomly selected until there were 26–27 eligible patients for each GP. The endpoint was cumulative incidence of anxiety as measured by the PRIME-MD screening tool over 18 months. Results: A total of 3326 patients without depression and 140 GPs from 70 practices consented and were eligible to participate; 328 of these patients were removed because they had an anxiety syndrome at baseline. Of the 2998 valid patients, 2597 (86.6%) were evaluated at the end of the study. At 18 months, 10.4% (95% CI = 8.7% to 12.1%) of the patients in the predictD-intervention group developed anxiety compared with 13.1% (95% CI = 11.4% to 14.8%) in the usual-care group (absolute difference = −2.7% [95% CI = −5.1% to −0.3%]; P = 0.029). Conclusion: A personalised intervention delivered by GPs for the prevention of depression provided a modest but statistically significant reduction in the incidence of anxiety.

Type: Article
Title: Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X714041
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X714041
Language: English
Additional information: This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/).
Keywords: anxiety, controlled clinical trial, depression, primary care, primary prevention
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Division of Psychiatry
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > Institute of Epidemiology and Health > Primary Care and Population Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10120673
Downloads since deposit
36Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item