UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Maximum depositional age estimation revisited

Vermeesch, P; (2021) Maximum depositional age estimation revisited. Geoscience Frontiers , 12 (2) pp. 843-850. 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.008. (In press). Green open access

[img]
Preview
Text
1-s2.0-S1674987120301894-main.pdf - Published version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

In a recent review published in this journal, Coutts et al. (2019) compared nine different ways to estimate the maximum depositional age (MDA) of siliclastic rocks by means of detrital geochronology. Their results show that among these methods three are positively and six negatively biased. This paper investigates the cause of these biases and proposes a solution to it. A simple toy example shows that it is theoretically impossible for the reviewed methods to find the correct depositional age in even a best case scenario: the MDA estimates drift to ever smaller values with increasing sample size. The issue can be solved using a maximum likelihood model that was originally developed for fission track thermochronology by Galbraith and Laslett (1993). This approach parameterises the MDA estimation problem with a binary mixture of discrete and continuous distributions. The ‘Maximum Likelihood Age’ (MLA) algorithm converges to a unique MDA value, unlike the ad hoc methods reviewed by Coutts et al. (2019). It successfully recovers the depositional age for the toy example, and produces sensible results for realistic distributions. This is illustrated with an application to a published dataset of 13 sandstone samples that were analysed by both LA-ICPMS and CA-TIMS U–Pb geochronology. The ad hoc algorithms produce unrealistic MDA estimates that are systematically younger for the LA-ICPMS data than for the CA-TIMS data. The MLA algorithm does not suffer from this negative bias. The MLA method is a purely statistical approach to MDA estimation. Like the ad hoc methods, it does not readily accommodate geological complications such as post-depositional Pb-loss, or analytical issues causing erroneously young outliers. The best approach in such complex cases is to re-analyse the youngest grains using more accurate dating techniques. The results of the MLA method are best visualised on radial plots. Both the model and the plots have applications outside detrital geochronology, for example to determine volcanic eruption ages.

Type: Article
Title: Maximum depositional age estimation revisited
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.008
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.008
Language: English
Additional information: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Zircon, U–Pb, Geochronology, Statistics, Maximum depositional age
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences > Dept of Earth Sciences
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10118704
Downloads since deposit
13Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item