UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Euston station redevelopment: Regeneration or gentrification?

Hickman, R; Garcia, MM; Arnd, M; Peixoto, LFG; (2021) Euston station redevelopment: Regeneration or gentrification? Journal of Transport Geography , 90 , Article 102923. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102923. Green open access

[thumbnail of hickman_Euston2020_JTRG_final_GREEN.pdf]
Preview
Text
hickman_Euston2020_JTRG_final_GREEN.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

The redevelopment of railways stations and their surrounding neighbourhoods offers many opportunities in terms of regeneration, yet there are also concerns over the potential gentrification of areas and displacement of the existing population and local businesses. The most prominent voice on these issues is typically from the project promoter, reflecting their position of power in the decision-making process, but there are other voices to be understood, including varied views from the local community. This paper uses Q methodology to develop discourses associated with the proposed High Speed Two project and redevelopment of Euston station and the surrounding neighbourhoods. 28 in-depth surveys are used with local residents, local employees, politicians, local government officers and academics, covering attitudes to the proposed Euston redevelopment. The Q method analysis highlights three major discourses: the ‘Community Activist’, the ‘Rail Promoter’, and the ‘Optimistic Practitioner’. Understanding these different discourses, and their components, is important for decision-makers in ensuring that investment strategies can better reflect the different viewpoints evident in the public domain. Ultimately, this can help to improve the social consequences of transport investment.

Type: Article
Title: Euston station redevelopment: Regeneration or gentrification?
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102923
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102923
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Keywords: Q methodology, Discourse analysis, Railway station, Regeneration, Gentrification
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of the Built Environment > The Bartlett School of Planning
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10116444
Downloads since deposit
47Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item