Hepburn, J;
Paparinskis, M;
Poulsen, LNS;
Waibel, M;
(2020)
Investment Law before Arbitration.
Journal of International Economic Law
, 23
(4)
pp. 929-947.
10.1093/jiel/jgaa037.
![[thumbnail of Paparinskis_Investment Law before Arbitration_27 October.pdf]](https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
Paparinskis_Investment Law before Arbitration_27 October.pdf - Accepted Version Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 19 December 2022. Download (406kB) |
Abstract
Investment law was not always about investor–state arbitration. Based on British and German archival materials from the Cold War, this paper shows how aims and priorities in the investment treaty regime changed over time. We find important differences in the role and relative importance of different legal rules then and now. Most notably, national treatment and free transfer clauses were key in early investment law, whereas fair and equitable treatment was regarded as relatively unimportant. At the same time, early drafters did anticipate some of the most contentious issues in modern investment law, including treaty shopping, shareholder protection, and the ‘no greater rights’ proviso.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Investment Law before Arbitration |
| DOI: | 10.1093/jiel/jgaa037 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa037 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Political Science |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10113836 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
