Pick, S;
Hodsoll, J;
Stanton, B;
Eskander, A;
Stavropoulos, I;
Samra, K;
Bottini, J;
... Nicholson, TR; + view all
(2020)
Trial Of Neurostimulation In
Conversion Symptoms (TONICS): a
feasibility randomised controlled trial
of transcranial magnetic stimulation for
functional limb weakness.
BMJ Open
, 10
(10)
, Article e037198. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037198.
Preview |
Text
e037198.full.pdf - Published Version Download (946kB) | Preview |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used therapeutically for functional (conversion) motor symptoms but there is limited evidence for its efficacy and the optimal protocol. We examined the feasibility of a novel randomised controlled trial (RCT) protocol of TMS to treat functional limb weakness. DESIGN: A double-blind (patient, outcome assessor) two parallel-arm, controlled RCT. SETTING: Specialist neurology and neuropsychiatry services at a large National Health Service Foundation Trust in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a diagnosis of functional limb weakness (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth Edition). Exclusion criteria included comorbid neurological or major psychiatric disorder, contraindications to TMS or previous TMS treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to receive either active (single-pulse TMS to primary motor cortex (M1) above resting motor threshold) or inactive treatment (single-pulse TMS to M1 below resting motor threshold). Both groups received two TMS sessions, 4 weeks apart. OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed recruitment, randomisation and retention rates. The primary outcome was patient-rated symptom change (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale, CGI-I). Secondary outcomes included clinician-rated symptom change, psychosocial functioning and disability. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, both TMS visits and at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were recruited and 21 (96%) were successfully randomised (active=10; inactive=11). Nineteen (91%) patients were included at follow-up (active=9; inactive=10). Completion rates for most outcomes were good (80%-100%). Most patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the trial in both groups, although ratings were higher in the inactive arm (active=60%, inactive=92%). Adverse events were not more common for the active treatment. Treatment effect sizes for patient-rated CGI-I scores were small-moderate (Cliff's delta=-0.1-0.3, CIs-0.79 to 0.28), reflecting a more positive outcome for the active treatment (67% and 44% of active arm-rated symptoms as 'much improved' at session 2 and follow-up, respectively, vs 20% inactive group). Effect sizes for secondary outcomes were variable. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol is feasible. The findings suggest that supramotor threshold TMS of M1 is safe, acceptable and potentially beneficial as a treatment for functional limb weakness. A larger RCT is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN51225587.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
