Shi, X; Nommeots-Nomm, A; Todd, NM; Devlin-Mullin, A; Geng, H; Lee, PD; Mitchell, CA; Shi, X; Nommeots-Nomm, A; Todd, NM; Devlin-Mullin, A; Geng, H; Lee, PD; Mitchell, CA; Jones, JR; - view fewer (2020) Bioactive glass scaffold architectures regulate patterning of bone regeneration in vivo. Applied Materials Today , 20 , Article 100770. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100770.

Preview

Text J322_Shi_App_Mat_Today_as_submitted_2020.pdf - Accepted Version Download (5MB) | Preview

Abstract

The architecture of bone scaffolds, such as pore dimensions, connectivity and orientation can regulate osteogenic defect repair, as can their rate of degradation. Synthetic bone grafts have historically been developed with foam structures to mimic trabecular bone. Now, Additive Manufacturing techniques enable production of open and regular pore architectures with improved compressive strengths. Here, we compare two types of bioactive glass scaffolds, made of the highly biodegradable ICIE16 composition, with distinctively different architectures but matched interconnect sizes (~150 µm), produced via two different techniques: gel-cast foaming and direct ink writing. A rabbit lateral femoral defect model was used to compare the effect of their architecture on in vivo bone regeneration, relative to a defect only control group, after 4 and 10 weeks of implantation. 3D X-ray microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), correlated to histology and back-scatter electron microscopy (BS-SEM) permitted quantitative evaluation of new bone ingrowth and degradation of the scaffolds. Both foam and printed scaffolds showed equal or higher bone ingrowth compared to the control group. After 4 weeks, the foam group showed the highest osteogenesis, with 51% more bone ingrowth than the defect only controls, but after 10 weeks the defect treated with the printed scaffold had the most bone ingrowth (40% more than the empty defect). Energy dispersive X-ray (EDS) mapping revealed degradation of the glass and calcium-phosphate deposition. The foam group showed more rapid degradation than the printed group, due to higher total porosity (even though interconnected pore size was equivalent). The foam scaffold appeared to allow rapid bone ingrowth and cancellous bone formation, whereas the printed scaffold seemed to provoke cortical-like bone formation, while remaining in place for longer than the 10 week study. While the foam's concave architectures promote initial bone ingrowth, the higher strength open pore channels of the printed scaffolds are beneficial for scaffolds made of highly degradable bioactive glasses.

Download activity - last month

Export as CSVXMLJSON

Download activity - last 12 months

Export as JSONXMLCSV

Downloads by country - last 12 months

Export as XMLCSVJSON

Archive Staff Only

View Item