Stafford, R;
Croker, AR;
Rivers, EM;
Cantarello, E;
Costelloe, B;
Ginige, T;
Sokolnicki, J;
... Shiel, C; + view all
(2020)
Evaluating optimal solutions to environmental breakdown.
Environmental Science & Policy
, 112
pp. 340-347.
10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.008.
Preview |
Text
Stafford_et_al(2020)EnvSciPolCopy.pdf - Accepted Version Download (607kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The severity of environmental threats, especially climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution, are well established, as is the urgent need for them to be addressed. These threats act both in isolation as well as synergistically to contribute to overall ‘environmental breakdown’. Debate exists around the most optimal governance and policy approaches to address these threats and, to date, little quantitative evidence exists to compare the different approaches. Using a modified Bayesian belief network model to assess the probability of environmental threats, we compare and contrast a range of proposed policy solutions to a selection of contemporary environmental problems that have been identified as having the potential to contribute to, or indeed may lead to environmental breakdown. Through interrogation of the models, we conclude that policies that prioritise economic growth at the expense of nature would be largely ineffective, whereas a more integrated approach, adopting comprehensive ‘Green New Deal’ policies combined with nature-based solutions would be the most effective approaches to preventing environmental breakdown, as they address societal and environmental issues simultaneously. We therefore recommend that decision makers take an integrated approach to decision making and policy development, accounting for social, economic and environmental drivers that ensure delivery of multiple benefits and real change.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Evaluating optimal solutions to environmental breakdown |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.008 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.008 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| Keywords: | Climate change, Biodiversity loss, Pollution, Nature-based solutions, Green New Deal, Economic growth |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Geography |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10107751 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
