Nord, CL;
Halahakoon, DC;
Lally, N;
Limbachya, T;
Pilling, S;
Roiser, JP;
(2020)
The neural basis of hot and cold cognition in depressed patients, unaffected relatives, and low -risk healthy controls: An fMRI investigation.
Journal of Affective Disorders
, 274
pp. 389-398.
10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.022.
Preview |
Text
Roiser_The neural basis of hot and cold cognition in depressed patients, unaffected relatives, and low -risk healthy controls_VoR.pdf - Published Version Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern cognitive neuropsychological models of depression posit that negatively biased emotional (“hot”) processing confers risk for depression, while preserved executive function (“cold”) cognition promotes resilience. METHODS: We compared neural responses during hot and cold cognitive tasks in 99 individuals: those at familial risk for depression (N = 30 unaffected first-degree relatives of depressed individuals) and those currently experiencing a major depressive episode (N = 39 unmedicated depressed patients) with low-risk healthy controls (N = 30). Primary analyses assessed neural activation on two functional magnetic resonance imaging tasks previously associated with depression: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) responsivity during the n-back working memory task; and amygdala and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) responsivity during incidental emotional face processing. RESULTS: Depressed patients exhibited significantly attenuated working memory-related DLPFC activation, compared to low-risk controls and unaffected relatives; unaffected relatives did not differ from low-risk controls. We did not observe a complementary pattern during emotion processing. However, we found preliminary support that greater DLPFC activation was associated with lower amygdala response during emotion processing. LIMITATIONS: These findings require confirmation in a longitudinal study to observe each individual's risk of developing depression; without this, we cannot identify the true risk level of the first-degree relative or low-risk control group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have implications for understanding the neural mechanisms of risk and resilience in depression: they are consistent with the suggestion that preserved executive function might confer resilience to developing depression in first-degree relatives of depressed patients.
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
