UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Investigating working practices of dentists on shade taking: Evidence based good practice versus observed practice

Shah, P; Louca, C; Patel, R; Fine, P; Blizard, R; Leung, A; (2020) Investigating working practices of dentists on shade taking: Evidence based good practice versus observed practice. Journal of Dentistry , 97 , Article 103341. 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103341. Green open access

[thumbnail of Leung_202004 Working practices on shade taking accepted version.pdf]
Preview
Text
Leung_202004 Working practices on shade taking accepted version.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (668kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate UK dentists' working practices on shade taking and to assess whether these clinical practices are in accordance with evidence-based guidelines. MATERIALS & METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was carried out using a questionnaire designed to elicit quantitative and qualitative data. This included two clinical scenarios (vignettes), which required respondents to describe the steps they would take during shade taking and the prescription sent to the dental technician. RESULTS: 170 completed questionnaires were analyzed. 167 respondents (98.9 %) used manual methods for shade taking. 98 (57.6 %; 95% CI: 50 %, 65 %) respondents followed guidelines on the first vignette, 73 (42.9 %; 95% CI:35 %,51 %) followed guidelines on the second and 41(26.5 %; 95% CI:20 %,33 %) followed guidelines for both. Specialist Professional status (χ24= 10.76;p = 0.03) and more frequent use of daylight (χ2 lin = 6.09;p = 0.01) were both predictive of good practice. Qualitative data analyses revealed several themes: a) the time shade was taken, b) light source used, c) shades for different aspects of the tooth, d) dental care professional (DCP) opinion, and e) photographic support. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that dentists needed to improve their shade taking techniques. A quarter of respondents consistently followed evidence-based good practice guidelines; the remaining three quarters undertook shade taking with a degree of chance and possibly guesswork, potentially generating errors in communication with dental laboratories, resulting in sub-optimal clinical outcomes. Appropriate training needs to be incorporated in the relevant dental curricula. This study highlighted the importance of compiling accurate and detailed laboratory prescriptions in relation to the shade of the restorations to be fabricated.

Type: Article
Title: Investigating working practices of dentists on shade taking: Evidence based good practice versus observed practice
Location: England
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103341
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103341
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Evaluation, Shade taking, Teaching postgraduates
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Eastman Dental Institute > EDI Continuing Professional Develop.
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10102869
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item