UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Enhancing Methodological Reporting in Public Administration: The Functional Equivalents Framework

Mele, V; Esteve, M; Lee, S; Bel, G; Capellano, G; Petrovsky, N; Ospina, S; (2020) Enhancing Methodological Reporting in Public Administration: The Functional Equivalents Framework. American Review of Public Administration , 50 (8) pp. 811-824. 10.1177/0275074020933010. Green open access

[thumbnail of Esteve_ARPA_Final_18 May.pdf]
Preview
Text
Esteve_ARPA_Final_18 May.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (419kB) | Preview

Abstract

Public administration scholarship reflects a multidisciplinary field in which many theoretical perspectives coexist. However, one of the dark sides of such theoretical pluralism is methodological fragmentation. It may be hard to assess the research quality and to engage with the findings from studies employing different methodologies, thus limiting meaningful conversations. Moreover, the constant race across social sciences to make methodologies more sophisticated may exacerbate the separation between academic and practitioner audiences. To counterbalance these two trends, this article aims at increasing methodological intelligibility in our field. It does so starting from the idea that each methodology entails choices in the conventional phases of research design, data collection, and data analysis, and that these choices must be reported. The paper nails down and exemplifies such reporting needs for five selected methodologies: survey studies, quantitative experimental studies, quantitative observational studies, qualitative case studies and ethnographies. Based on their discussion and comparison, the paper offers a framework composed by functional equivalents, that is to say, the common denominator among methodological reporting needs. Methodological choices that need reporting include the rationale for the selection of a methodology, delimitation of the study, the research instrument, data processing and ethical clearance. Increasing methodological reporting would facilitate dialogues among different methodological communities, and with practitioner readers. All of which would also promote field building in the scholarship of public administration.

Type: Article
Title: Enhancing Methodological Reporting in Public Administration: The Functional Equivalents Framework
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/0275074020933010
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020933010
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: reporting, methodologies, research methods, research traditions
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of S&HS > Dept of Political Science
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10097660
Downloads since deposit
28Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item