Ku, P-W;
Hamer, M;
Hsueh, M-C;
Chen, L-J;
(2020)
Response to the letter titled 'Double counting individuals in meta-analysis artificially inflates precision.'.
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
, 30
(6)
pp. 1085-1086.
10.1111/sms.13692.
Preview |
Text
sms.13692.pdf - Accepted Version Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
We thank Tarp and colleagues for their interest in our work. Regarding the issue of duplicate study effects, it is an interesting area of discussion given that more and more cohorts are making their data publicly available and replication of research questions inevitable (and important). Study duplication ranges from complete replication of all study measurements and study effects to complete independence of all study measures and study effects based on different sub-samples.
| Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title: | Response to the letter titled 'Double counting individuals in meta-analysis artificially inflates precision.' |
| Location: | Denmark |
| Open access status: | An open access version is available from UCL Discovery |
| DOI: | 10.1111/sms.13692 |
| Publisher version: | https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13692 |
| Language: | English |
| Additional information: | This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions. |
| Keywords: | LIPA, guideline, meta-regression, recommendation |
| UCL classification: | UCL UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Div of Surgery and Interventional Sci |
| URI: | https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10096377 |
Archive Staff Only
 |
View Item |
