UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Assumptions of authority: the story of Sue the T-rex and controversy over access to fossils

Jones, ED; (2020) Assumptions of authority: the story of Sue the T-rex and controversy over access to fossils. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences , 42 (1) , Article 2. 10.1007/s40656-019-0288-4. Green open access

[thumbnail of Assumptions of authority - the story of Sue the T-rex and controversy over access to fossils.pdf]
Preview
Text
Assumptions of authority - the story of Sue the T-rex and controversy over access to fossils.pdf - Published Version

Download (587kB) | Preview

Abstract

Although the buying, selling, and trading of fossils has been a principle part of paleontological practice over the centuries, the commercial collection of fossils today has re-emerged into a pervasive and lucrative industry. In the United States, the number of commercial companies driving the legal, and sometimes illegal, selling of fossils is estimated to have doubled since the 1980s, and worries from academic paleontologists over this issue has increased accordingly. Indeed, some view the commercialization of fossils as one of the greatest threats to paleontology today. In this article, I address the story of “Sue”—the largest, most complete, and most expensive Tyrannosaurus rex ever excavated—whose discovery incited a series of high-profile legal battles throughout the 1990s over the question of “Who owns Sue?” Over the course of a decade, various stakeholders from academic paleontologists and fossil dealers to Native Americans, private citizens, and government officials all laid claim to Sue. In exploring this case, I argue that assumptions of authority are responsible for initiating and sustaining debates over fossil access. Here, assumptions of authority are understood as assumptions of ownership, or expertise, or in some cases both. Viewing the story from this perspective illuminates the significance of fossils as boundary objects. It also highlights the process of boundary-work by which individuals and groups constructed or deconstructed borders around Sue (specifically) and fossil access (more generally) to establish their own authority. I draw on science studies scholarship as well as literature in the professionalization, commercialization, and valuation of science to examine how assumptions of authority facilitated one of the most divisive episodes in recent paleontological history and the broader debate on the commercial collection of vertebrate fossil material in the United Sates.

Type: Article
Title: Assumptions of authority: the story of Sue the T-rex and controversy over access to fossils
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1007/s40656-019-0288-4
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-019-0288-4
Language: English
Additional information: © The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Paleontology, Dinosaurs, Professionalization, Commercialization, Valuation, Boundary objects, Boundary-work, Access, Ownership, Expertise
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences > Dept of Science and Technology Studies
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10091506
Downloads since deposit
101Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item