UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Investor Obligations for Human Rights

Choudhury, B; (2020) Investor Obligations for Human Rights. ICSID Review , 35 (1-2) pp. 82-104. 10.1093/icsidreview/siaa002. Green open access

[thumbnail of Choudhury_Manuscript ICSIDRev Revision 7.pdf]
Preview
Text
Choudhury_Manuscript ICSIDRev Revision 7.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (477kB) | Preview

Abstract

Despite progress being made in the business and human rights field in defining corporate responsibility for human rights, defining foreign investors roles vis-à-vis human rights remains mainly stagnant. The idea that businesses have responsibility for human rights is well ensconced in global norms and is based on society's expectations of business in the 21st century. Yet despite this widespread recognition, international investment law is silent on the matter. This leaves a disconnect between the norms dictating the corporate responsibility for human rights in public international law and those found in international investment law. One way to better align progress in the business and human rights movement with international investment law is to introduce investor obligations for human rights. These obligations can be located both in investment treaties as well as in non-treaty sources. Moreover, investment arbitration provides multiple entrypoints for tribunals to consider such obligations, for example through counterclaims, jurisdictional claims, or admissibility claims, among others. Two primary benefits arise from introducing investor obligations for human rights. First, it can act as vehicle by which business and human rights norms, generally, can be enforced. Second, and more importantly, introducing investor obligations for human rights can help to better contextualize the interpretation of IIAs. Introducing such obligations can be used to remind tribunals that international investment law operates in a system that includes non-investment concerns such as human rights. Considering such obligations, in and of themselves, however, are unlikely to prompt wider changes in international investment law. Nevertheless, including investor obligations in international investment law may prompt tribunals to give more balanced interpretations to international investment agreements. This can work towards ensuring that international investment law serves its ultimate aim of promoting a state’s development.

Type: Article
Title: Investor Obligations for Human Rights
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/siaa002
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaa002
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10091378
Downloads since deposit
223Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item