UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The Legal Significance of Expert Treaty Bodies Pronouncements for the Purpose of the Interpretation of Treaties

Azaria, D; (2020) The Legal Significance of Expert Treaty Bodies Pronouncements for the Purpose of the Interpretation of Treaties. International Community Law Review , 22 (1) pp. 33-60. 10.1163/18719732-12341420. Green open access

[thumbnail of Azaria_The Legal Significance of Expert Treaty Bodies Pronouncements for the Purpose of the Interpretation of Treaties_VoR.pdf]
Preview
Text
Azaria_The Legal Significance of Expert Treaty Bodies Pronouncements for the Purpose of the Interpretation of Treaties_VoR.pdf - Published Version

Download (600kB) | Preview

Abstract

Although it is widely accepted that the pronouncements of expert treaty bodies are not binding, this does not mean that they are deprived of any effect in law. This study focuses on their legal effects vis-à-vis the interpretation of treaties, and explores how the International Court of Justice and the International Law Commission have dealt with the pronouncements of expert treaty bodies in relation to the interpretation of treaties. The tale about the Court’s and the Commission’s approaches in this respect demonstrates the profound belief of both the Court and the Commission that international law is a legal system, which calls for reliance on the pronouncements of expert treaty bodies as integral actors within the legal system with some ‘authority’ concerning the determination of the law (within their mandate). This does not mean that the Court and the Commission support a ‘blind reliance’ on such pronouncements; rather the quality of each pronouncement is a criterion for relying on it. The reasoning of the Court and (and implicitly of) the Commission also shows that they consider that international law as a legal system, which necessitates ‘legal consistency’. This in turn suggests that the reliance on pronouncements of expert treaty bodies, which are mandated to supervise the application (and interpretation) of particular treaties, may constitute an exercise of ‘systemic integration’ which exceeds the confines of the rule set forth in Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

Type: Article
Title: The Legal Significance of Expert Treaty Bodies Pronouncements for the Purpose of the Interpretation of Treaties
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1163/18719732-12341420
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341420
Language: English
Additional information: © Danae Azaria, 2020. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: expert treaty bodies; treaty interpretation; International Court of Justice; International Law Commission; systemic integration; criteria for relying on pronouncements of expert treaty bodies
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL SLASH > Faculty of Laws
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10087318
Downloads since deposit
342Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item