UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Peer assessment of individual contribution in group work: a student perspective

Grammenos, R; Garcia Souto, M; Chester, I; Albelda Gimeno, L; (2019) Peer assessment of individual contribution in group work: a student perspective. In: Proceedings of the SEFI 47th Annual Conference. Varietas delectat... Complexity is the new morality. (pp. pp. 1594-1606). European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) Green open access

[thumbnail of Grammenos_Peer assessment of individual contribution in group work. A student perspective_AAM.pdf]
Preview
Text
Grammenos_Peer assessment of individual contribution in group work. A student perspective_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (866kB) | Preview

Abstract

With group work increasing in popularity at universities, students no longer feel it is acceptable to be awarded the same group mark. This presents a significant challenge in awarding an individual mark which reflects unequivocally the time and effort a student has invested in a group project. To address this challenge, a tool to evaluate individual peer assessed contribution (IPAC) has been developed at University College London (UCL). The aim of this paper is to report on the perceptions of students regarding their experience of peer assessment in group work, since these perceptions are key to ensuring that a tool, such as IPAC, is accepted and used effectively by staff and students alike. The views of 133 students were acquired through anonymous surveys and focus groups ranging from first year undergraduate to doctoral students across 12 different departments. Results showed that 92% of students are in favour of peer assessment with a positive trend to using the IPAC tool. Receiving constructive feedback was considered imperative amongst respondents, which in turn should identify clearly the points of error; highlight explicitly the areas for improvement; and thus reflect accurately the mark being awarded. The attributes that students valued to be important when assessing their teammates were, in decreasing order of priority, attendance at meetings, listening and communication, actual contribution to the project deliverables, quality of the work produced, personal circumstances, and finally time management and organization skills. The detailed analysis and conclusions drawn from this study are the focus of this paper.

Type: Proceedings paper
Title: Peer assessment of individual contribution in group work: a student perspective
Event: SEFI 47th Annual Conference
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Dates: 16 September 2019 - 20 September 2019
ISBN-13: 978-2-87352-018-2
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
Publisher version: https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/SEF...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: Peer assessment; individual contribution; group work; student perceptions
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Electronic and Electrical Eng
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Med Phys and Biomedical Eng
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10086610
Downloads since deposit
5,071Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item